Sin City
- Directed by:
- Frank Miller
- Robert Rodriguez
- Rated: R
Caveat: Reviews are bunk. Trust no one’s opinion but your own.
Sin City is a movie based upon three of the Sin City comics by Frank Miller. In the comics, Basin City is a rough place populated by rough people: crooked politicians, ugly killers, and beautiful whores. In Miller’s highly concentrated film noir universe, innocence is brutalized and no good deed goes unpunished. Despite this bleak setting, Miller’s books are successful in being both titillating and amusing. With plentiful use of nudity and violence, Miller’s “Sin City” books are entertaining, if a bit repetitive.
The movie brings to the screen three of Miller’s comic miniseries (which you can now find collected as “graphic novels”). The translation is faithful to a fault. The dialogue and scenery which is evocative and striking on the page of a comic book is merely silly and contrived when seen on a screen populated with real people. Too often, Sin City seems more like a parody of film noir than a real movie. In some scenes the dialogue is so bad that the audience I was part of couldn’t help laughing, and I joined them.
I was reminded of another movie adaptation of a comic, Dick Tracy. The two movies have a lot in common, aside from their graphic origins. Both feature characters in heavy appliances, purple dialogue, implausible plots, and visual styles that are more appropriate to a small page than a big screen. However, Sin City is even more cartoonlike than Dick Tracy, with characters even more shallow and stereotypical. About halfway through the movie, it seems that Sin City is lapping itself: beautiful whore, ugly killer, crooked politician. How many times can we see the same story in one film? Apparently the answer is “four”.
Some will also draw parallels to Pulp Fiction, the brilliant second film from Quentin Tarentino. Both movies have a non-linear timeline, and both movies feature outrageous violence. But the similarity ends there. Pulp Fiction has a variety of unique and interesting characters with clever and realistic dialogue. Sin City has three characters (i.e., ugly killer, beautiful whore, crooked politician) with dialogue so over-the-top and melodramatic that it parodies actual film noir.
What works on the comic page does not often work on the big screen: the exceptions are dramatic and well-known. For example, The Crow deviated significantly from the comic in both style and substance, but it was a much better movie. In fact, I think The Crow as a movie was a much better movie than “The Crow” as a comic was as a comic. “Sin City” the comic is a much better comic than Sin City the movie is as a movie. It kind of reminds me of early television shows, which were basically radio shows in front of a camera. They’re different media, and they require different techniques to use them well.
Like so many movie adapations of comics, Sin City is mildly entertaining, but not very good. The best way to enjoy Frank Miller’s work is in print, but if it’s film noir you are looking for, you would be better off renting The Maltese Falcon, Touch Of Evil, Blade Runner, or The Grifters.
Style: 5/5 (faithfully reproduces the look of the comic)
Substance: 2/5 (a repetitive parody of film noir)
What’s it worth: $5.00 – $6.00 (in the Wal-Mart bargain DVD bin a year from now)